Margin Call Directed by J.C. Chandor Essays -- film analysis

Margin Call (2011)Margin Call is a 2011 consider that seeks to give viewers a deeper perspective of the pecuniary crisis that hit the unite States in 2008. The film was written and directed by J.C. Chandor. It s depicting of the happenings on Wall Street has been described as the closest to the developed happenings during the financial crisis. In this film, the main characters atomic number 18 faced with a clean challenge and they act according to their personal world views. Personal financial needs atomic number 18 put before the clients needs. The questionable manner in which the characters act put the employees on Wall Street on a cross road. It is a difficult balancing act between defend oneself and protecting others. The decisions made by characters in this film create an probability for pack to discuss the balancing act between self deliverance and killing the dreams of the masses.From the beginning, the film is filled with controversial decisions. First, the firm t hat is depicted in this film decides to dress off most of the employees in the firm expiration only 20% of the plumpers. However, the firms managers do not land off the workers personally but hire another firm to do this. Without prior warning, the mass layoff takes place in a rather unresponsive manner with employees expected to leave immediately. First, the decision by the company to lay off the people without warning is a questionable decision. Though they are offered a severance package, the employees are traumatized by the lay off. Having reported to work just like a normal day, none of the employees expect that they are going to lose their jobs on this particular day. Therefore, it is a surprise when the leased human resource team comes in and explains to the employees that they no long... ...ce of gold at whatever costs. At the end of the day, the managers watch as more people are laid off as the crisis continues. In conclusion, I dissent with the decisions made by the main characters in this film. Their predicament is tough to show the least, but it does not warrant the decisions they make. They choose to follow a passageway with the full knowledge of the problems it will cause to other people. The decisions made are motivated purely by money and the need to self hold on and protect. The drive behind the sale of worthless assets is for the company to remain aimless even when clients suffer losses. It is dangerous to make decisions driven by money and selfishness. It leads to guilt as it causes endless pain to other people. Therefore, these characters could have elect the alternative option of protecting their clients as opposed to protecting themselves.