An Argument For Animal Research :: essays research papers

An Argument For Animal ResearchMedicine has come a very long way since the days when men used to deflateholes into the skull to release tension or evil spirits. In the last matchlesshundred years, for the sake of humanity, numerous vaccinations stand beendeveloped, disease and disorders of all types have been prevented, surgicaltechniques have been advanced, drugs have been developed to cure ailments andthe list continues endlessly. The turn over that has been achieved in knowledgeas well as safety in medical practice is correlated directly to fauna research.It is one disputation to control fleshly research so that needless death of animals atomic number 18 not rendered, besides it is absolutely different to argue that animals haverights which supplant human subsistence. "For most of the past decade, theanimal-rights movement hasnt merely opposed animal research it hastried to destroy it." ( The Wall Street Journal, "Animals and indisposition", rascal378.) Animal rights advocates and activists generally have ethical objectionsregarding treatment of animals during experimentation, but the use of animals inresearch for the benefit of all people is and unceasingly will be justifiable.Over 99 percent of all animal experiments are on rats and mice developedexpressly for laboratory use. "Less than 1 percent of experiments involve cats,dogs, farm animals, nonhuman primates, frogs, fish, and birds." ( Encyclopediaof Medicine, AMA, "Animal experiment", Page 110.) Animal rights advocates sample to sway public opinion by showing grotesque pictures of destroyed cats, dogs,farm animals, dolphins, and monkeys which account for less than 1 percent of theexperiments, yet it seems 99 percent of their advertising and campaigning commodewith this one percent. At least the American public realizes even those who pose ethical righteousness can be wrong. For instance, " an American Medical fellowship ( AMA ) poll found that 77 percent of adults think that usinganimals in medical research is necessary." ( The Wall Street Journal, "Animalsand Sickness", Page 378.)It is a curious thing to see animal welfare groups try to hinder animalresearch by threatening researchers lives and destroying years of information collected.Animal rights groups are promoting even more animal testing because the liketests will have to be repeated to replace the lost data. In every major medicalresearch university there have been more or less form of nuisance to deter animaltesting whether it was a subdued riot or endangering the lives of researchers.Animal rights groups must realize research is through out of necessity forhuman welfare. Whenever possible alternatives to animal experiments are used."The training of modern research techniques, such as CAT scans, PET scans,