The New Generation: Internet and the Side Effects

The New Generation meshing and the Side Effects Submitted to professor Tonio Sadik Submitted by John Yoo (4578772) SOC 3116 C November 16th 2011 The article, A Fantasy domain of a function Is Creating Problems in southwestern Korea published by Choe Sang-Hun from The New York Times hold forth the growing come forth of internet gaming addiction among adults in conspiracy Korea (Choe, 2010). With the emergence of the internet, more(prenominal) and more people somewhat the reality kick the bucket with superstar another on a day-to-day basis fag oute this modern communication technology.As the digital generation in the 21st degree Celsius continues to stay online, there is a need to critically examine the issue of whether or not there is a correlation between the beat of time people spend online (including surfing the sack up, complaisant net roleplaying, instant pass, online gaming, etc. ) and its effects on their social behaviour. This essay will focus on how peopl e interact online based on certain theories that whitethorn formulate the increase of internet addiction and the potential consequences these issues may bring to our adjacent generation.In comparison to the previous generations who allow grown up mostly with books and outside activities, the generation Z or the internet generation today argon integrating the digital culture into their early lives. For these generations, the net, compete videogames, downloading music onto an iPod, or multitasking with a cell phone is no more complicated than shot the toaster oven to bake or turning on the TV.However, it is important to celebrate that internet was first developed for the military and was not use commercially until 1990s when its information-sharing and communicative functions attracted the interest of corporations and then of the superior general public (Gackenbach, 2007, p. 18). Nowadays, it is a mandatory condition for employees to use internet at work, to use email and grapple files. Furthermore, due to the rapid development of the internet and other modernistic tools such as smart phones being able to be connected anywhere all times, it is unimaginable how more one can do in a small amount of time.Thus, if people today do not participate in online activities, they usually tend to feel excluded or proponentless or, at the very least, out of date (Gackenbach, 2007, p. 19). As much as the internet being the new way to communicate and sh ar information efficiently, Karl Marx pointed out that certain new technologies hold in incredible power to shape human behaviour and social structures (Wallace, 1999, p. 13). Whether his theory is the complete verity or not, through and through various research and past investigations, one may hypothesize that excessive usage of internet for a long stoppage of time may real(a)ly shape human behaviour.On the contrary to the hypothesis, some(prenominal) studies have examined the association between time on th e Internet and social and psychological factors, and these studies seem less likely to find veto associations. Morgan and cotton plants (2003) study of college freshmen found that increased time spent shopping, playing games and doing research was associated with higher levels of depression, but confideing e-mail and visiting chit murmur rooms was associated with lower levels (Shields & Kane, 2011).This may be true as many a(prenominal) college students tend to communicate through online chat rooms to either family or booster shots, or send e-mail to loved ones as a stress-relief from studies or work. Thus, expert spending time on the internet may be too broad of a term, and need to be more stipulate as to what typewrite of internet usage. From the journal Social and Psychological Correlates of Internet exercising among College Students, Gordon et al. (2007) also argues that the reasons why privates use the Internet must be taken into account in order to understand associat ions (Shields & Kane, 2011).Our personality is the come of our emotions, cognition, and behaviour (Amichai-Hamburger, 2005). Most of the time in the real mankind, only the start of our personality may become visible to others speckle the rest of it corpse unrevealed, and on the contrast to the real world, there exists a more custodial environment over the internet that sometimes encourages people to express themselves more freely than they would in a real world interaction (Amichai-Hamburger, 2005).This type of interaction may be found within internet backchat forums where people with anonymous or virtual IDs being able to dissertate about certain matters on a topic/idea or on issues from around the world. This is also quite an visible within online chat rooms where people get to communicate with others from all over the world without publicly sharing their identification from the start. The idea of being unidentified may give users the comfort to reveal more of who they rea lly be or give the option to be someone all told different.Disinhibition is defined as the inability to control impulsive behaviours, suasions, or feelings, and manifests online as people communicating in ways that they would not ordinarily do offline and can be positive or negative (Gackenbach, 2007, p. 58). The concept of disinhibition can be quite surprising for example, Nidederhoffer and Pennebaker (2002) were amazed when, in post-experimental inter stares, students who had just engaged online in subject invitations for sex, explicit sexual language, or tidings of graphic sexual escapades (p. 4) were overmodest and shy (Gackenbach, 2007, p. 59). This idea of disinhibition may be translated into people argon calm down being themselves online but it is being part of themselves that they generally keep plum hidden. Suler explains six general reasons why people extend their emotional grammatical construction of the self fleck online divisible Anonymity, Invisibility, Asyn chronicity, Solipsistic Introjection, Dissociative Imagination, and Minimization of Status and government agency (Gackenbach, 2007, p. 59). 1.Dissociative Anonymity Although not a formal pathology, the understanding of self while online becomes compartmentalized into an online self which is perceived as alone and anonymous, and an offline self that is different. Because the Internet feels so virtual and boundary-less, it is tempting to perceive the other as not real 2. Invisibility No need to worry about how you aspect when chatting with someone online 3. Asynchronicity For many online communications, one can respond at ones leisure and the pressure of an immediate response is gone 4.Solipsistic Introjection The online acquaintance becomes incorporated into ones intrapsychic world. Some of these interactions are real and immediate, while others are somewhat less so, such as an imagined comeback to your boss. The online friend can take on a special military position in our imagi ned internal dialogues, which can result in a felt sense of special closeness existing outside the boundaries of time and space 5. Dissociative Imagination Some people keep careful boundaries between their online selves and their real-world selves.So, for instance, in online role-playing games such as Everquest, when the computer is turned off, the online self as a wizard is gone. This idea of separate realm provides the online self the freedom to do things which the offline self would not do, such as flirt outrageously or act aggressively 6. Minimization of Status and Authority An example may be although you know that your boss has a higher level of status from you at work, when responding to his e-mails, that gap minimizes.Thus, it sometimes becomes easy to make a squiffy or sarcastic comment by e-mail that would never have been spoken during face-to-face situation (Gackenbach, 2007, p. 60) With these facets in mind, which can be revealed through interactions on the Internet, one may argue that unexpressed behaviours can be generalized from virtual world into the real world. Most of us picture cyberspace, however, lot of us just never give much thought to the online persona how we come across to the people with whom we interact online (Wallace, 1999).People in general do not give much thought into what the person on the other side of the screen actually think of them. This may be because many times those people are either their friends or family (people who are close in the real world) or they are someone completely unknown who may reside on the other side of the world in the real world that one may just dont care about what they think of them.However, there is an increase in how online persona is playing a larger role when it comes to first impressions as in this generation people rely on e-mails, Web sites, and discussion forums more for the first contact, and the phone call, letter, or face-to-face meetings less (Wallace, 1999). This change magnitude trend of communication through e-mail and online messaging tools are yet thoroughly visible in the public workplaces, such as organization of Canada (GoC). Everyday, public servants send and receive e-mails using the common GoC e-mail messaging tool, Microsoft Outlook whether it is through lackberry or workstation (PC). As many of these people work in collaboration with others across the country or even around the world, there is a strong need to be careful on how their e-mail is written so that there are low chances of attainable miscommunication with the other person. There is an issue that is currently visible due to ample amounts of e-mail and sharing of information over internet. The Library and Archives Canada (LAC) states that globally, we send 35billion emails per day in the Government of Canada (GoC) we send 18million per day. 0%ofGoCbusiness is now conducted by email 99. 9%of government records are digital() The issue is that some of the departments in GoC are now face d with these massive amounts of e-mails (both transitory which are personal e-mails and are useless to the organization and of business value) and it is estimated that 85% of corporate data resides conversationally in those unstructured formats outside of corporate custody and control, in the PC desktops under the custody and control of individuals or groups().Being able to communicate more efficiently is an important factor, however, the unlimited communications of cyberspace permitted by the web and networks nowadays and this exponential growth of information means that one just cannot capture and preserve all of it.There are many personality theories pertinent to the interaction on the internet, such as the need for closure, the need for cognition, risk of exposure taking, sensation seeking, attachment, and locus of control, one theory that is considered by many to have the most relevance to the social aspects of the Internet Interaction is the extroversion and neurosis pers onality theory (Amichai-Hamburger, 2005, p. 28). This theory is one of the developments of Carl Jungs extroversion-introversion personality typology and is used to explain the possible relationship between extroversion, neuroticism and loneliness (Amichai-Hamburger, 2005, p. 9). fit in to this model, some people tend to hold a negative view of themselves and the world and as a result, perceive themselves as depressed, worthless, and lonely, regardless of their actual social network. From series of studies, it is found that only the correlation between extroversion and loneliness, and not that between neuroticism and loneliness, is mediated by the size of the individuals social network. Thus, people who are high in neuroticism seem o be lonely not because of their difficulty in forming and maintaining relationships, but rather as a result of their general negative bias (Amichai-Hamburger, 2005, p. 30). Bibliography Academic Sources Amichai-Hamburger, Y. (2005). The Social Net Human Behaviour in Cyberspace. Oxford University Press. Chen, J. V. , Ross, W. H. , & Yang, H. -H. (2011). Personality and Motivational Factors Predicting Internet Abuse at Work. Cyberpsychology Journal of Psychosocial look for on Cyberspace.Choe, S. -H. (2010, May 26). A Fantasy World Is Creating Problems in South Korea. The New York Times. Gackenbach, J. (2007). Psychology and the Internet Intrapersonal, Interpersonal, and Transpersonal Implications. Elsevier. Shields, N. , & Kane, J. (2011). Social and Psychological Correlates of Internet Use among College Students. CyberPsychology Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace. Wallace, P. (1999). The Psychology of The Internet. Cambridge University Press.